Skip to: Curated Story Group 1
Visually Open Nav.
US
APAC
EUROPE
subscribe
Home
Sections
Sections
Architectural Glass
Building Restoration and Maintenance
Commercial Contractors
Concretes, Aggregates and Construction Materials
Construction Cladding
Construction Consulting
Construction Engineering Services
Construction Equipment
Construction Forensic and Owners Representative
Construction Insulation, Coating and Waterproofing
Construction Interiors
Construction Staffing
Doors and windows
Flooring System
HVAC
Kitchen and Bath
Mechanical Electrical and Plumbing
Modular and Prefab Construction
Outdoor Construction
Pre-Construction Services
Residential Construction
Roofing and Siding Systems
Specialty Construction
Wall Systems
Contributors
Vendors
News
Conferences
Newsletter
About
CXO Awards
Welcome back to this new edition of Construction Business Review !!!
✖
Sign In
Subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter to get latest updates to your inbox
JULY 2023CONSTRUCTIONBUSINESSREVIEW.COM 19decisions to reduce environmental impact (https://github.com/BHoM/LifeCycleAssessment_Toolkit/wiki). (For readers specifically interested in how digital and technology can help create more sustainable design, I recommend checking out a new group I'm involved in that was created to focus on making a difference in this area, ZERO (http://zeroconstruct.com)).As Arthur C Clarke famously noted "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" and in this enthusiastic embrace of tech, it is all too easy to forget that this wizardry can carry an entirely novel set of risks. Hearing of the fabulous benefits of a new piece of software, clients simply specify that they want "that" within their requirements, tenders or correspondence. Saying you "want BIM", or instructing a consultant to "create a digital twin" can be interpreted in myriad ways. And this gulf between parties' understanding and expectations is likely not to become apparent until later on in the project, when the differing expectations all-too-often lead to expensive disputes. If you're simply asking for "some BIM models", how do you truly assert that these have not been delivered as intended? This can be aggravated by a lack of knowledge, and coupled with a fear to "ask stupid questions", and in the resulting confusion obtuse digital specifications are issued, or unachievable requirements are accepted, or it's simply just not spelled out clearly in the contract documentation. Whilst not playing out in public forums, it is common knowledge that expensive, time consuming legal disputes are ongoing worldwide arising from parties differing interpretation of digital specifications, including alleged failures to deliver the deliverables to the relevant scopes. There are various ways to mitigate these risks and avoid such unnecessary misunderstandings: including sufficient clarity in contractually binding documents, and ensuring regular collaborative discussions and standardised processes both internally and externally. That topic could indeed take a whole article in itself, but I hope this has given you some food for thought.The stressful, unfortunate, and unexpected events of the last couple of years have undeniably led to greater uptake in digitalisation and technology. Parties recognise the benefits and are more open to further developments in this area. However, we still have a little way to go before digitalisation and technology become fully business-as-usual within the construction industry. So, we must continue to work hard in implementing and progressing the area wherever we can. There are many organisations who provide active support to achieve this, most notably the UK BIM Alliance (https://www.ukbimalliance.org/). Together, we can ensure true development to the digitalised, digitised, Construction 4.0. The increased use of digitalisation and technology sped up the progress of issues of sustainability, equality and improved living and working standards
<
Page 9
|
Page 11
>