Thank you for Subscribing to Construction Business Review Weekly Brief
This article is part of Construction Business Review Insights series featuring expert contributions nominated by our subscribers and reviewed by our editorial team.
For years, the standard practice has been to hand complex LCPtracker management and weekly payroll reviews to project accountants, office managers, or payroll personnel. These professionals are brilliant at their primary roles, but prevailing wage law is an entirely different beast. When you ask an overworked accountant to suddenly become a compliance expert and subcontractor wrangler on top of their day job, things inevitably slip through the cracks. Deficiencies pile up, and the project carries hidden liabilities.
Hope is not a compliance strategy. To protect your budget and your team’s sanity, prevailing wage management must be treated as an executive-level risk management system. At Naylor Construction Consulting (NCC), we partner with GCs to solve this exact bottleneck through two distinct, highly predictable avenues.
1.Tiered Executive Prevailing Wage Management
For General Contractors looking to completely offload the burden from their internal teams, NCC offers a Tiered Flat-Fee Management Model. We operate as an enterprise-level partner, giving Project Managers and Executives absolute budget predictability from the day they break ground until the final closeout documents are signed.
Our retainers are based strictly on the economy of scale and the total volume of subcontractors assigned to your project, keeping your budget clean and reliable:
• Predictable Baselines: A standard multi-million dollar project is assigned a flat monthly retainer that covers the heavy lifting of compliance for a set baseline (e.g., up to 25 subcontractors). This includes system setup, weekly payroll reviews, and deficiency tracking.
• Logical Scalability: If a project expands and requires a larger fleet of subcontractors, the fee scales logically. We utilize a simple "Volume Escalator," where the monthly retainer increases by a nominal, flat rate for every additional block of subcontractors added to the project.
• Closeout Protection: We know that the tail-end of a project often consists of chasing down final documents from subs who have long left the site. Our model includes an automatic step-down "Closeout Phase" rate, ensuring you aren't paying peak active-construction management fees when the site is winding down.
This model allows GCs to bake a hard, predictable number into their General Conditions budget on day one. No surprises, just a dedicated team of compliance experts keeping your project moving.
2.Empowering Your Internal Team: Executive On-Site Trainings
We also recognize that some GCs prefer to keep their compliance management in-house. But you cannot simply assign this to your project accountants without giving them the practical tools to succeed.
To bridge this gap, NCC offers Intensive Half-Day On-Site Trainings ($2,500). I personally travel to your office to conduct a deep-dive workshop with your PMs, accountants, and administrative staff.
We do not teach generic, textbook overviews. Instead, we pull up your exact, active projects to help your team identify immediate weak spots and provide real-time solutions. Our training focuses heavily on practical education, assisting your team with specific project requirements, and establishing internal best practices based on the latest prevailing wage compliance standards. It is a $2,500 investment that equips your internal team to manage compliance confidently, efficiently, and accurately.
Predictability is Profitable
In today’s regulatory environment, General Contractors need enterprise-level solutions, not guesswork. Whether you are looking to fully outsource your prevailing wage management to a predictable, flat-fee agency, or you want to bulletproof your internal teams with hands-on executive training, NCC is built to protect your margins. Stop relying on hope, and start investing in predictable systems.
The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.